Home / vs / Tabby
vsTABBY

Bonfire Terminal vs Tabby

Tabby is an open-source, on-device AI coding assistant, free to self-host with a paid enterprise tier, running local models fully offline with an 81 Sovereign Score. It is a self-hosted code completion server. Bonfire Terminal is a broader sovereign terminal agent, local-first, one-time license, keys at cost with no markup.

Apply for AccessAI CODING ASSISTANT
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs Tabby: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factorTabbyBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Coding AssistantAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityGitHub 34k starsGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureOn-Device LocalOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policySelf-host = fully privateFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityYesYes
Pricing tier range$0 self-host / paid enterpriseOne-time license
Execution unit costUnlimited Local ComputeUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupN/ANo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersLocal;AnyOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesAPI Key;Local/None;SSOAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score81 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

Tabby81/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+12 on sovereignty

Where Tabby lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & ControlTabby 35 / 35
35
Bonfire 35
Cost EfficiencyTabby 23 / 25
23
Bonfire 25
Technical CapabilitiesTabby 8 / 25
8
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)Tabby 15 / 15
15
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose Tabby if…

Choose Tabby if you want a self-hosted, on-device coding assistant serving local-model completions across your team's IDEs.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a general sovereign agent beyond coding, with messaging bridges, speech and media processing.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs Tabby: FAQ

Is Tabby private?

Tabby is highly private, being open source and running on-device with local models and full offline support, so code never leaves your infrastructure. Bonfire Terminal shares this local-first design, keeping your data and BYO provider key on your own device.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than Tabby?

Tabby is free to self-host with paid enterprise plans. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license with no subscription, and any external LLM usage runs through your own key at raw provider cost with no markup added.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace Tabby?

Partly, since Tabby specializes in IDE code completion. Bonfire Terminal handles coding tasks through a terminal agent while also covering messaging, speech, and media. If you want breadth beyond completions, Bonfire fits; for team-wide autocomplete, Tabby is purpose-built.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that Tabby can't?

Bonfire Terminal adds Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, local Whisper speech, and local media processing. Tabby, focused on on-device code completion, offers no messaging bridges, speech engine, or media handling.

How do I switch from Tabby to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal and point it at a local model, mirroring Tabby's on-device approach. Add any provider key if desired. Coding tasks move from IDE completions to terminal instructions, with broader agentic capabilities available too.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs Tabby?

Both work offline. Tabby runs local models fully offline, and Bonfire Terminal is likewise local-first, running its agent, Whisper speech, and media processing on-device, so core functionality persists without connectivity when a local model is configured.