Home / vs / Sourcegraph Cody
vsSOURCEGRAPH CO

Bonfire Terminal vs Sourcegraph Cody

Sourcegraph Cody is a hybrid AI coding assistant, freemium up to $9 monthly, with no training on user code across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or any provider, and no markup. Bonfire Terminal is fully on-device instead, keeping code local, with bring-your-own-key at cost, bridges, and a one-time perpetual license.

Apply for AccessAI CODING ASSISTANT
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs Sourcegraph Cody: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factorSourcegraph CodyBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Coding AssistantAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityNot disclosedGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureHybridOn-Device Local
Licensing modelFreemiumOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyNo training on user codeFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityNoYes
Pricing tier range$0-$9/moOne-time license
Execution unit costSubscriptionUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersOpenAI;Anthropic;Google;AnyOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesSSO;API Key;OAuthAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score59 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

Sourcegraph Cody59/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+34 on sovereignty

Where Sourcegraph Cody lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & ControlSourcegraph Cody 21 / 35
21
Bonfire 35
Cost EfficiencySourcegraph Cody 18 / 25
18
Bonfire 25
Technical CapabilitiesSourcegraph Cody 8 / 25
8
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)Sourcegraph Cody 12 / 15
12
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if…

Choose Sourcegraph Cody if you want a code-aware assistant with deep codebase context and multi-provider support for development.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a private, on-device assistant with a one-time license rather than a hybrid coding subscription.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs Sourcegraph Cody: FAQ

Is Sourcegraph Cody private?

Cody does not train on user code, which is good, but it is hybrid, so code context can be processed in the cloud. Bonfire Terminal keeps everything on-device with nothing leaving the machine, scoring 93/100 for sovereignty over Cody's hybrid model.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than Sourcegraph Cody?

Cody is freemium up to $9 monthly with no key markup. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license, also markup-free, so beyond Cody's free tier Bonfire avoids the recurring subscription.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace Sourcegraph Cody?

Partly. Cody specializes in codebase-aware suggestions and IDE integration, which Bonfire does not replicate. For private, on-device coding help and general AI tasks with your own models, Bonfire Terminal covers much of the ground.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that Sourcegraph Cody can't?

Bonfire Terminal runs fully offline, keeps code on-device, transcribes with local Whisper, processes media locally, and bridges Telegram and WhatsApp. Cody is a hybrid coding assistant without offline use, messaging bridges, or a local speech engine.

How do I switch from Sourcegraph Cody to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal, bring the same OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google key you used with Cody at cost, and work on-device. You trade Cody's codebase-context IDE features for full local privacy under a one-time license.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs Sourcegraph Cody?

Bonfire Terminal works fully offline with local models. Cody is hybrid with no offline capability, so its code-aware features depend on the cloud, whereas Bonfire runs entirely on your device.