Bonfire Terminal vs @robota-sdk/agent-framework
@robota-sdk/agent-framework is a free, open-source, on-device AI-agent framework, fully private when self-hosted, supporting OpenAI, Anthropic, and Google, with partial offline support and a 75 sovereign score. Bonfire Terminal is a finished on-device agent rather than an SDK, adding local Whisper, messaging bridges, and BYO-key at cost under one perpetual license.
Bonfire Terminal vs @robota-sdk/agent-framework: the 16-factor comparison
| Rating factor | @robota-sdk/agent-framework | Bonfire Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Agent Framework | AI Terminal / Local Agent |
| Popularity | Not disclosed | Growing · indie |
| Hosting architecture | On-Device Local | On-Device Local |
| Licensing model | Open Source | One-Time Perpetual |
| Data / training policy | Self-host = fully private | Fully local — nothing leaves device |
| Offline capability | Partial | Yes |
| Pricing tier range | Free (OSS) | One-time license |
| Execution unit cost | Not disclosed | Unlimited Local Compute |
| API-key markup | N/A | No — BYO key at cost |
| Supported LLM providers | OpenAI;Anthropic;Google | OpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any |
| Auth / permission types | API Key | API Key; Local/None |
| Phone / messaging bridges | None | Telegram; WhatsApp |
| Speech recognition engine | None | Whisper (local) |
| Local media processing | No | Yes |
| Sovereign score | 75 / 100 | 93 / 100 |
The sovereignty gap
Where @robota-sdk/agent-framework lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.
Which should you choose?
Choose @robota-sdk/agent-framework if…
Choose @robota-sdk/agent-framework if you are a developer who wants a free open-source SDK to build self-hosted agents across major providers.
Choose Bonfire Terminal if…
Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a ready-to-run on-device agent with speech and bridges, without building on an SDK.
Bonfire Terminal vs @robota-sdk/agent-framework: FAQ
Is @robota-sdk/agent-framework private?
Yes, self-hosting makes it fully private, running agent logic on your own infrastructure. Bonfire Terminal offers the same local-first privacy out of the box, keeping agent activity, Whisper transcription, and media processing on-device with no setup burden.
Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @robota-sdk/agent-framework?
@robota-sdk/agent-framework is free and open source, so it costs nothing to adopt. Bonfire Terminal charges a one-time license but delivers a finished agent with no key markup, saving the engineering time of building on an SDK yourself.
Can Bonfire Terminal replace @robota-sdk/agent-framework?
For users wanting a working agent, yes. Bonfire Terminal is a ready-made on-device agent supporting major providers, whereas @robota-sdk is an SDK you code against. Bonfire replaces it unless you need to build custom agents in your own codebase.
What can Bonfire Terminal do that @robota-sdk/agent-framework can't?
Bonfire Terminal ships local Whisper speech, local media processing, Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, and a finished on-device interface. @robota-sdk/agent-framework is a developer SDK with no built-in speech, bridges, or ready-to-use interface.
How do I switch from @robota-sdk/agent-framework to Bonfire Terminal?
If you were building agents on @robota-sdk but want a finished product, install Bonfire Terminal, add your OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google key, and use its on-device agent directly, avoiding SDK development and hosting.
Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @robota-sdk/agent-framework?
@robota-sdk/agent-framework offers partial offline support depending on your provider. Bonfire Terminal runs Whisper and media processing fully offline on-device, only reaching the network when you invoke a hosted model.