Home / vs / PromptQL
vsPROMPTQL

Bonfire Terminal vs PromptQL

PromptQL is a cloud-hosted AI agent framework billed per task at about $0.042 per program-execution plus tokens, using Anthropic and Google via OAuth or SSO with a Slack bridge. Bonfire Terminal inverts that model: everything runs on-device, you supply any provider key at cost with no markup, and you pay once, forever.

Apply for AccessAI AGENT FRAMEWORK
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs PromptQL: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factorPromptQLBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Agent FrameworkAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityNot disclosedGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureCloud-HostedOn-Device Local
Licensing modelPer-TaskOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyNot disclosedFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityNoYes
Pricing tier range$0.042/program-execution + tokensOne-time license
Execution unit costPay-Per-TaskUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersAnthropic;GoogleOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesOAuth;SSOAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesSlackTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score37 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

PromptQL37/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+56 on sovereignty

Where PromptQL lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & ControlPromptQL 7 / 35
7
Bonfire 35
Cost EfficiencyPromptQL 15 / 25
15
Bonfire 25
Technical CapabilitiesPromptQL 10 / 25
10
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)PromptQL 5 / 15
5
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose PromptQL if…

Choose PromptQL if you want a managed cloud agent framework with Slack integration and per-execution billing across Anthropic and Google models.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want on-device privacy, at-cost keys and a perpetual license instead of cloud hosting and per-task charges.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs PromptQL: FAQ

Is PromptQL private?

PromptQL is cloud-hosted and its data and training policy is unknown, so prompts pass through its servers. Bonfire Terminal is local-first by design, keeping all data on your device and sending only the provider calls you explicitly authorize.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than PromptQL?

PromptQL charges roughly $0.042 per program-execution plus tokens on a per-task model. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license with providers billed at cost and no markup, so recurring per-execution fees disappear after purchase.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace PromptQL?

For local agent work, yes. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device automation across many providers. It does not replicate PromptQL's managed cloud framework or its Slack-centric hosted workflow, which some teams may still prefer.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that PromptQL can't?

PromptQL is cloud-only with a Slack bridge and no offline, speech, or media features. Bonfire Terminal runs locally, adds Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, local Whisper speech recognition, and on-device media processing.

How do I switch from PromptQL to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal locally and add your Anthropic or Google key, the same providers PromptQL supports, billed at cost. You leave cloud hosting and per-execution fees behind while keeping your model choice.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs PromptQL?

PromptQL is cloud-hosted with no offline capability. Bonfire Terminal is local-first, running Whisper speech and media processing offline and supporting local models; only remote provider calls require an internet connection.