Home / vs / @openai/codex-security
vs@OPENAI/CODEX-

Bonfire Terminal vs @openai/codex-security

OpenAI Codex is a hybrid, open-source AI coding assistant with 105k GitHub stars, offered through freemium ChatGPT plans on OpenAI models, with no training on API or business data by default. Bonfire Terminal is a broader sovereign on-device agent: nothing leaves the device, your own key at cost, and a one-time perpetual license.

Apply for AccessAI CODING ASSISTANT
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs @openai/codex-security: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factor@openai/codex-securityBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Coding AssistantAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityGitHub 105k starsGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureHybridOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyNo training on API/business data by defaultFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityPartialYes
Pricing tier rangeFreemium (ChatGPT plans)One-time license
Execution unit costSubscriptionUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersOpenAIOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesAPI Key;OAuthAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score67 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

@openai/codex-security67/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+26 on sovereignty

Where @openai/codex-security lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & Control@openai/codex-security 25 / 35
25
Bonfire 35
Cost Efficiency@openai/codex-security 25 / 25
25
Bonfire 25
Technical Capabilities@openai/codex-security 2 / 25
2
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)@openai/codex-security 15 / 15
15
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose @openai/codex-security if…

Choose @openai/codex-security if you want OpenAI's own coding agent tightly integrated with ChatGPT and its models for software development tasks.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a general on-device AI agent you own outright, supporting any provider, with all data kept local.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs @openai/codex-security: FAQ

Is @openai/codex-security private?

OpenAI Codex does not train on API or business data by default, but it is hybrid and routes work through OpenAI's cloud. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device, so your code and data never leave your machine at all.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @openai/codex-security?

Codex is offered through freemium ChatGPT subscription plans that recur monthly. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license, after which you pay LLM providers directly at cost with no markup, avoiding ongoing subscription fees.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace @openai/codex-security?

Partly. Codex is a coding agent tied to OpenAI's models and ChatGPT. Bonfire's on-device agent can write and edit code with your key across any provider, though it is not tied to OpenAI's specific coding integrations.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that @openai/codex-security can't?

Bonfire runs on-device, supports any provider, and adds Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, local Whisper speech recognition, and local media processing. Codex is cloud-connected, limited to OpenAI, and lacks these local, provider-agnostic agent capabilities.

How do I switch from @openai/codex-security to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal and add your own key, which can still be an OpenAI key if you prefer their models. Recreate your coding prompts and tasks as Bonfire agents, now running locally on-device.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @openai/codex-security?

Codex is hybrid and needs OpenAI's cloud for its coding agent. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device, so Whisper transcription and local media processing work offline; LLM calls need connectivity but route directly to your own provider key.