Home / vs / @marsnme/mcp-gateway
vs@MARSNME/MCP-G

Bonfire Terminal vs @marsnme/mcp-gateway

@marsnme/mcp-gateway is an agent-framework MCP gateway that connects to any provider through an API key. Bonfire Terminal is not a gateway but a finished on-device agent: it runs locally, bills your provider key at cost with no markup, and arrives as a one-time perpetual license.

Apply for AccessAI AGENT FRAMEWORK
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs @marsnme/mcp-gateway: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factor@marsnme/mcp-gatewayBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Agent FrameworkAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityNot disclosedGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureNot disclosedOn-Device Local
Licensing modelNot disclosedOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyNot disclosedFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityNot disclosedYes
Pricing tier rangeNot disclosedOne-time license
Execution unit costNot disclosedUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNot disclosedNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersAnyOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesAPI KeyAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score32 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

@marsnme/mcp-gateway32/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+61 on sovereignty

Where @marsnme/mcp-gateway lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & Control@marsnme/mcp-gateway 9 / 35
9
Bonfire 35
Cost Efficiency@marsnme/mcp-gateway 8 / 25
8
Bonfire 25
Technical Capabilities@marsnme/mcp-gateway 8 / 25
8
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)@marsnme/mcp-gateway 7 / 15
7
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose @marsnme/mcp-gateway if…

Choose @marsnme/mcp-gateway if you are wiring MCP connections across providers and want a flexible any-provider gateway.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a complete on-device agent with provider choice and a perpetual license.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs @marsnme/mcp-gateway: FAQ

Is @marsnme/mcp-gateway private?

@marsnme/mcp-gateway has an unpublished hosting model, and gateways generally relay traffic through their infrastructure. Bonfire Terminal is local-first, so your requests stay on your device except for the explicit provider calls you choose to make.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @marsnme/mcp-gateway?

@marsnme/mcp-gateway does not publish pricing tiers. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license, then your own LLM usage at cost with no markup, so ongoing spend is just metered tokens rather than gateway overhead.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace @marsnme/mcp-gateway?

If you want an agent that runs tasks, yes. Bonfire Terminal is a full on-device agent supporting any provider. @marsnme/mcp-gateway is specifically an MCP routing layer, so it differs if you only need connection brokering between tools and models.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that @marsnme/mcp-gateway can't?

Bonfire Terminal is a complete on-device agent with local Whisper, local media processing, and Telegram and WhatsApp bridges. @marsnme/mcp-gateway is a provider gateway without these; it brokers connections rather than running a full workflow.

How do I switch from @marsnme/mcp-gateway to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal and add your provider key directly, since Bonfire connects to models itself without a separate gateway. Everything runs on your device, so there is no routing service left to operate once you move over.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @marsnme/mcp-gateway?

@marsnme/mcp-gateway routes to remote providers and does not document offline use. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device with local models and Whisper, so core features work without internet where a gateway cannot.