Bonfire Terminal vs @igniter-js/agents
@igniter-js/agents is a free, open-source, on-device AI-agent framework that is fully private when self-hosted, supports any provider, and offers partial offline support, scoring a high 77 for sovereignty. Bonfire Terminal delivers a finished on-device agent instead of a framework, adding local Whisper, messaging bridges, and BYO-key at cost under one perpetual license.
Bonfire Terminal vs @igniter-js/agents: the 16-factor comparison
| Rating factor | @igniter-js/agents | Bonfire Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | AI Agent Framework | AI Terminal / Local Agent |
| Popularity | Not disclosed | Growing · indie |
| Hosting architecture | On-Device Local | On-Device Local |
| Licensing model | Open Source | One-Time Perpetual |
| Data / training policy | Self-host = fully private | Fully local — nothing leaves device |
| Offline capability | Partial | Yes |
| Pricing tier range | Free (OSS) | One-time license |
| Execution unit cost | Not disclosed | Unlimited Local Compute |
| API-key markup | N/A | No — BYO key at cost |
| Supported LLM providers | Any | OpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any |
| Auth / permission types | API Key | API Key; Local/None |
| Phone / messaging bridges | None | Telegram; WhatsApp |
| Speech recognition engine | None | Whisper (local) |
| Local media processing | No | Yes |
| Sovereign score | 77 / 100 | 93 / 100 |
The sovereignty gap
Where @igniter-js/agents lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.
Which should you choose?
Choose @igniter-js/agents if…
Choose @igniter-js/agents if you are a developer who wants a free open-source, self-hostable agent framework to build custom AI agents in JavaScript.
Choose Bonfire Terminal if…
Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a ready-to-run on-device agent with speech and bridges, without building on a framework yourself.
Bonfire Terminal vs @igniter-js/agents: FAQ
Is @igniter-js/agents private?
Yes, when self-hosted it is fully private, keeping agent logic on your own infrastructure. Bonfire Terminal offers the same local-first privacy out of the box, running agent activity, Whisper, and media processing on-device with no self-hosting setup required.
Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @igniter-js/agents?
@igniter-js/agents is free and open source, so it costs nothing to adopt. Bonfire Terminal charges a one-time license but delivers a finished agent with no key markup, saving the engineering time of building and maintaining a framework yourself.
Can Bonfire Terminal replace @igniter-js/agents?
For users who want a working agent, yes. Bonfire Terminal is a ready-made on-device agent, whereas @igniter-js/agents is a framework you code against. Bonfire replaces it unless you specifically need to build bespoke agents in your own stack.
What can Bonfire Terminal do that @igniter-js/agents can't?
Bonfire Terminal ships local Whisper speech, local media processing, Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, and a finished on-device interface. @igniter-js/agents is a developer framework with no built-in speech, bridges, or ready-to-use interface.
How do I switch from @igniter-js/agents to Bonfire Terminal?
If you were building agents on @igniter-js/agents but want a finished product, install Bonfire Terminal, add your provider key, and use its on-device agent directly, avoiding framework development and hosting.
Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @igniter-js/agents?
@igniter-js/agents offers partial offline support depending on your provider. Bonfire Terminal runs Whisper and media processing fully offline on-device, only reaching the network when you invoke a hosted model, giving reliable offline local operation.