Home / vs / @helicone/ai-gateway
vs@HELICONE/AI-G

Bonfire Terminal vs @helicone/ai-gateway

@helicone/ai-gateway is an open-source, hybrid LLM gateway, free to self-host or paid in the cloud, routing OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Azure, or any provider with pay-per-token billing and no markup. Bonfire Terminal is a full on-device agent rather than a routing layer, with BYO-key billing at cost and a one-time perpetual license.

Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs @helicone/ai-gateway: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factor@helicone/ai-gatewayBonfire Terminal
CategoryOtherAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityGitHub 620 starsGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureHybridOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policySelf-host = privateFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityNoYes
Pricing tier range$0 self-host / paid cloudOne-time license
Execution unit costPay-Per-TokenUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersOpenAI;Anthropic;Google;Azure;AnyOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesAPI KeyAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score69 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

@helicone/ai-gateway69/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+24 on sovereignty

Where @helicone/ai-gateway lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & Control@helicone/ai-gateway 21 / 35
21
Bonfire 35
Cost Efficiency@helicone/ai-gateway 25 / 25
25
Bonfire 25
Technical Capabilities@helicone/ai-gateway 8 / 25
8
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)@helicone/ai-gateway 15 / 15
15
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose @helicone/ai-gateway if…

Choose @helicone/ai-gateway if you are a developer needing an open-source gateway to route, observe, and manage LLM API traffic.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a finished on-device AI agent, not infrastructure, under a perpetual license.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs @helicone/ai-gateway: FAQ

Is @helicone/ai-gateway private?

Self-hosted, @helicone/ai-gateway is private, but as a gateway it routes your prompts onward to cloud LLM providers by design. Bonfire Terminal is local-first, so with a local model your prompts, speech, and media never leave the device at all.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @helicone/ai-gateway?

@helicone/ai-gateway is free to self-host, with paid cloud tiers, and adds no token markup. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license with BYO-key billing at cost. Both avoid markup; Bonfire delivers a product rather than routing infrastructure you must run.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace @helicone/ai-gateway?

Not directly. @helicone/ai-gateway is developer infrastructure for routing and observing LLM traffic, while Bonfire Terminal is an end-user agent. If you need centralized API gateway management for an application, Helicone is purpose-built for that role.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that @helicone/ai-gateway can't?

Bonfire Terminal is a complete on-device agent with local Whisper speech recognition, local media processing, Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, and offline operation. @helicone/ai-gateway is a routing gateway without any user-facing agent, speech, or media capabilities.

How do I switch from @helicone/ai-gateway to Bonfire Terminal?

They serve different layers, so you may keep the gateway for app routing and add Bonfire Terminal for personal AI. For direct use, install Bonfire, plug in your key at cost, and run an agent on-device without operating a gateway.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @helicone/ai-gateway?

Bonfire Terminal runs fully offline with a local model across agent, speech, and media tasks. @helicone/ai-gateway has no offline capability, since a gateway exists to forward requests to cloud LLM providers and needs a network to function.