Home / vs / @hazeljs/rag
vs@HAZELJS/RAG

Bonfire Terminal vs @hazeljs/rag

@hazeljs/rag is a free, open-source, on-device RAG and knowledge library that is local-first and private with partial offline support, scoring a strong 71 for sovereignty. Bonfire Terminal shares that local-first ethos but delivers a finished agent, with local Whisper, messaging bridges, and BYO-key models at cost, under a single perpetual license.

Apply for AccessRAG/KNOWLEDGE
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs @hazeljs/rag: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factor@hazeljs/ragBonfire Terminal
CategoryRAG/KnowledgeAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityNot disclosedGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureOn-Device LocalOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyLocal-first privateFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityPartialYes
Pricing tier rangeFree (OSS)One-time license
Execution unit costPay-Per-TokenUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersNot disclosedOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesAPI KeyAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score71 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

@hazeljs/rag71/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+22 on sovereignty

Where @hazeljs/rag lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & Control@hazeljs/rag 31 / 35
31
Bonfire 35
Cost Efficiency@hazeljs/rag 25 / 25
25
Bonfire 25
Technical Capabilities@hazeljs/rag 0 / 25
0
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)@hazeljs/rag 15 / 15
15
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose @hazeljs/rag if…

Choose @hazeljs/rag if you are a developer building local-first retrieval-augmented knowledge features into your own JavaScript application.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a complete on-device agent with speech, bridges, and BYO-key models, not a RAG library to integrate.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs @hazeljs/rag: FAQ

Is @hazeljs/rag private?

Yes. @hazeljs/rag is local-first and private by design, keeping retrieval on-device. Bonfire Terminal matches this stance, running agent activity, Whisper transcription, and media processing on your machine rather than in a cloud service.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @hazeljs/rag?

@hazeljs/rag is free and open source, so it costs nothing for developers. Bonfire Terminal charges a one-time license but delivers a finished on-device agent, not a RAG library you must build a product around, and adds no key markup on hosted models.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace @hazeljs/rag?

For end users, largely; for developers, partly. @hazeljs/rag is a library for adding local retrieval to an app, while Bonfire Terminal is a ready-made agent that can reason over your local content. Bonfire replaces it if you want a product, not a component.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that @hazeljs/rag can't?

Bonfire Terminal is a complete on-device agent with local Whisper speech, local media processing, Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, and BYO-key LLM access. @hazeljs/rag is a retrieval library with no interface, speech, bridges, or model access of its own.

How do I switch from @hazeljs/rag to Bonfire Terminal?

If you wanted local knowledge retrieval as a usable tool rather than a library, install Bonfire Terminal and point it at your documents for on-device reasoning, skipping the integration work @hazeljs/rag requires.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @hazeljs/rag?

@hazeljs/rag offers partial offline support as a local-first library. Bonfire Terminal runs Whisper and media processing fully offline on-device, only reaching the network when you call a hosted model, giving strong offline coverage for local tasks.