Bonfire Terminal vs @computesdk/tensorlake
@computesdk/tensorlake is a cloud-hosted RAG/Knowledge service on a freemium, per-task model with partial media support. Bonfire Terminal offers sovereign retrieval instead: an on-device agent where your documents and data never leave the machine, media is processed locally, your LLM key is billed at cost, and licensing is one-time.
Bonfire Terminal vs @computesdk/tensorlake: the 16-factor comparison
| Rating factor | @computesdk/tensorlake | Bonfire Terminal |
|---|---|---|
| Category | RAG/Knowledge | AI Terminal / Local Agent |
| Popularity | Not disclosed | Growing · indie |
| Hosting architecture | Cloud-Hosted | On-Device Local |
| Licensing model | Freemium | One-Time Perpetual |
| Data / training policy | Not disclosed | Fully local — nothing leaves device |
| Offline capability | No | Yes |
| Pricing tier range | Not disclosed | One-time license |
| Execution unit cost | Pay-Per-Task | Unlimited Local Compute |
| API-key markup | Not disclosed | No — BYO key at cost |
| Supported LLM providers | Not disclosed | OpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any |
| Auth / permission types | API Key | API Key; Local/None |
| Phone / messaging bridges | None | Telegram; WhatsApp |
| Speech recognition engine | None | Whisper (local) |
| Local media processing | Partial | Yes |
| Sovereign score | 26 / 100 | 93 / 100 |
The sovereignty gap
Where @computesdk/tensorlake lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.
Which should you choose?
Choose @computesdk/tensorlake if…
Choose @computesdk/tensorlake if you want a cloud RAG service with freemium per-task pricing and don't need documents kept on-device.
Choose Bonfire Terminal if…
Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want knowledge and media processed entirely on-device, your own key at cost, and no per-task billing.
Bonfire Terminal vs @computesdk/tensorlake: FAQ
Is @computesdk/tensorlake private?
@computesdk/tensorlake is cloud-hosted with an unstated training policy, so your documents and knowledge base sit on its servers. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device, so your data never leaves your machine or trains a vendor's model.
Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @computesdk/tensorlake?
@computesdk/tensorlake is freemium with per-task billing that scales with indexing and query volume. Bonfire Terminal is a one-time perpetual license plus your own LLM key at cost with no markup, so heavy use doesn't accumulate per-task charges.
Can Bonfire Terminal replace @computesdk/tensorlake?
For knowledge tasks driven by an AI agent, Bonfire Terminal can process documents locally. If you depend on @computesdk/tensorlake's specific managed RAG indexing at scale, verify Bonfire's on-device approach meets your retrieval needs first.
What can Bonfire Terminal do that @computesdk/tensorlake can't?
Bonfire Terminal processes documents and media fully on-device rather than partially in the cloud, runs offline, adds local Whisper speech and Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, and uses your own LLM key with no markup.
How do I switch from @computesdk/tensorlake to Bonfire Terminal?
Stop your @computesdk/tensorlake per-task usage, install Bonfire Terminal, add your LLM key, and point Bonfire at your local documents. Rebuild retrieval workflows on-device; since Bonfire keeps data local, there's no cloud knowledge base to export.
Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @computesdk/tensorlake?
@computesdk/tensorlake has no offline capability and depends on its cloud, with only partial media support. Bonfire Terminal is local-first, so its agent, local Whisper, and media processing run offline, with only remote LLM calls needing internet.