Home / vs / Automa
vsAUTOMA

Bonfire Terminal vs Automa

Automa is an open-source, on-device browser-automation extension, free to run, executing workflows fully locally in the browser and offline, OpenAI-backed. It automates web tasks visually. Bonfire Terminal is a broader sovereign terminal agent, local-first, one-time license, provider-agnostic, with messaging bridges, speech and keys at raw cost.

Apply for AccessAUTOMATION/RPA
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs Automa: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factorAutomaBonfire Terminal
CategoryAutomation/RPAAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityGitHub 21.5k starsGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureOn-Device LocalOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyRuns locally in browserFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityYesYes
Pricing tier rangeFree (OSS)One-time license
Execution unit costUnlimited Local ComputeUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNoNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersOpenAIOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesLocal/NoneAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNoYes
Sovereign score70 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

Automa70/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+23 on sovereignty

Where Automa lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & ControlAutoma 28 / 35
28
Bonfire 35
Cost EfficiencyAutoma 25 / 25
25
Bonfire 25
Technical CapabilitiesAutoma 2 / 25
2
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)Automa 15 / 15
15
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose Automa if…

Choose Automa if you want a free, local browser extension to visually automate repetitive web tasks and scraping.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a general private on-device agent with bridges and speech beyond browser automation.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs Automa: FAQ

Is Automa private?

Automa is private, being open source and running workflows locally in your browser with no cloud dependency. Bonfire Terminal matches this local-first privacy as a general agent, keeping your data and BYO provider key on your own device.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than Automa?

Automa is free open source running local compute. Bonfire Terminal charges a one-time perpetual license, but it is a full AI agent rather than a browser extension, and any LLM usage runs through your own key at raw cost, no markup.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace Automa?

Partly, since Automa specializes in visual in-browser automation. Bonfire Terminal is a general agent that acts through natural language across tasks. If you want broad sovereign capabilities rather than browser-only automation, Bonfire fits your needs.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that Automa can't?

Bonfire Terminal supports any provider and adds Telegram and WhatsApp bridges, local Whisper speech, and local media processing. Automa is an OpenAI-backed browser extension with no messaging bridges, speech engine, or media handling of its own.

How do I switch from Automa to Bonfire Terminal?

If you used Automa for web tasks, install Bonfire Terminal and add any provider key. Bonfire executes agentic tasks locally as a sovereign on-device agent, replacing browser-only workflows with broader natural-language automation.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs Automa?

Both work offline. Automa runs locally in the browser, and Bonfire Terminal is local-first, running its agent, Whisper speech, and media processing on-device, so core functionality persists without connectivity when a local model is configured.