Home / vs / @atrib/agent
vs@ATRIB/AGENT

Bonfire Terminal vs @atrib/agent

@atrib/agent is a free, open-source agent framework aimed at developers. Bonfire Terminal is a finished on-device agent instead: it runs entirely locally, bridges to Telegram and WhatsApp, transcribes with Whisper, and passes any provider key through at cost with no markup under a perpetual license.

Apply for AccessAI AGENT FRAMEWORK
Full comparison

Bonfire Terminal vs @atrib/agent: the 16-factor comparison

Rating factor@atrib/agentBonfire Terminal
CategoryAI Agent FrameworkAI Terminal / Local Agent
PopularityNot disclosedGrowing · indie
Hosting architectureNot disclosedOn-Device Local
Licensing modelOpen SourceOne-Time Perpetual
Data / training policyNot disclosedFully local — nothing leaves device
Offline capabilityNot disclosedYes
Pricing tier rangeFree (OSS)One-time license
Execution unit costNot disclosedUnlimited Local Compute
API-key markupNot disclosedNo — BYO key at cost
Supported LLM providersNot disclosedOpenAI; Anthropic; Google; Local; Any
Auth / permission typesNot disclosedAPI Key; Local/None
Phone / messaging bridgesNoneTelegram; WhatsApp
Speech recognition engineNoneWhisper (local)
Local media processingNot disclosedYes
Sovereign score37 / 10093 / 100
Sovereign Software Score

The sovereignty gap

@atrib/agent37/ 100
Bonfire Terminal93/ 100+56 on sovereignty

Where @atrib/agent lands on each weighted pillar (its bar) — the red marker is Bonfire's score. Auto-derived from the 16 factors above.

Privacy & Control@atrib/agent 9 / 35
9
Bonfire 35
Cost Efficiency@atrib/agent 17 / 25
17
Bonfire 25
Technical Capabilities@atrib/agent 0 / 25
0
Bonfire 22
Vendor Risk (lower risk = higher score)@atrib/agent 11 / 15
11
Bonfire 11
Verdict

Which should you choose?

Choose @atrib/agent if…

Choose @atrib/agent if you want a free, open-source framework and enjoy building your own agent stack.

Choose Bonfire Terminal if…

Choose Bonfire Terminal if you want a ready on-device agent with bridges and local Whisper rather than a framework.

FAQ

Bonfire Terminal vs @atrib/agent: FAQ

Is @atrib/agent private?

@atrib/agent is open source, so its privacy depends on how you deploy it; hosting and data policies are unpublished. Bonfire Terminal is a packaged local-first product that keeps processing on your device, so its privacy posture is clear from the start.

Is Bonfire Terminal cheaper than @atrib/agent?

@atrib/agent is free open-source software plus model usage. Bonfire Terminal adds a one-time perpetual license, so it is not cheaper upfront, but it provides a full application and passes provider costs through at cost with no markup.

Can Bonfire Terminal replace @atrib/agent?

For those wanting a working agent rather than a toolkit, yes. Bonfire Terminal is a finished on-device terminal, while @atrib/agent is a developer framework, so it fits builders more than end users wanting a ready tool.

What can Bonfire Terminal do that @atrib/agent can't?

Bonfire Terminal ships as a usable app with local Whisper, local media processing, and Telegram and WhatsApp bridges. @atrib/agent is a framework without these built in, leaving you to assemble each capability yourself.

How do I switch from @atrib/agent to Bonfire Terminal?

Install Bonfire Terminal and add your provider key instead of maintaining framework code. You get a ready local-first app, and because everything runs on your device there is no hosted service to retire.

Does Bonfire Terminal work offline vs @atrib/agent?

@atrib/agent does not document offline support and depends on your model wiring. Bonfire Terminal runs on-device with local models and Whisper, so its core features keep working without a connection by design.